 |
|
28-06-2005, 14:52
|
#41
|
|
Trusted User
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: London, UK
Posts: 3,224
Thanks: 116
Thanked 35 Times in 30 Posts
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Herbal
I've got the Teaser and this is what should have be shown today, the above is a full blown trailer, as in the teasers no plot, no names nothing just music and running.
I'll try and host it but it will be only up for a few hours or so.
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Herbal
|
ARE YOU ON CRACK, MATE! 
Seems like not only have people NOT seen the original but they haven't even seen the 70's remake neither. 
__________________
Last films I watched (TV-DVD/BD/OD-Cinema)
The Mandalorian - V For Vendetta - Tenet
Last edited by gZa; 28-06-2005 at 14:57.
|
|
|
|
28-06-2005, 14:58
|
#42
|
|
Trusted User
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 8,100
Thanks: 123
Thanked 296 Times in 92 Posts
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Garry Cowell
|
Is there a need to shout at me! Ok i havent seen that either and my mate sent me the link.
So Sorry!!
|
|
|
|
|
28-06-2005, 15:01
|
#43
|
|
Sand Dab
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Orpington, Kent
Posts: 7,393
Thanks: 436
Thanked 327 Times in 122 Posts
|
Just seams to be almost a scene by scene re-make of the original to me. 
|
|
|
|
|
28-06-2005, 15:02
|
#44
|
|
vQp Singer
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Trowbridge, Wilts
Posts: 491
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Reno
I'm bothered about how pedestrian much of the trailer itself looks. Peter Jackson is a fanboy and this looks like a fanboy's film, slavishly faithfull to the original with not an ounce of originality or genuine imagination. You need a bit of visual poetry to make this surreal romance work and I'm not sure a director with as literal an approach as Jackson has can make it work. I found the New York shots especially disappointing. Rather than the glittering art deco monument to civilisation of the original this looks just like period piece dullsville.
|
I thought quite the opposite. I thought that PJ's direction style and WETA's visuals really give this an original feel. The NY shots looked great.
|
|
|
|
|
28-06-2005, 15:06
|
#45
|
|
XBL/PSN : SPOOKYVILLE
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: West Yorkshire
Posts: 15,962
Thanks: 0
Thanked 80 Times in 46 Posts
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Herbal
I've got the Teaser and this is what should have be shown today, the above is a full blown trailer, as in the teasers no plot, no names nothing just music and running.
|
there was supposed to be kong shown throwing the car in manhattan in the teaser trailer as it is mentioned several times in the lastest production diary on king is kong net...so whatever you had before removing it can't be correct..
Last edited by Spooky_uk; 28-06-2005 at 15:08.
|
|
|
|
|
28-06-2005, 15:14
|
#46
|
|
Trusted User
Join Date: May 2000
Location: staffordshire
Posts: 1,931
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
i thought the NY scenes looked good too, if he has followed the original people will not be happy, but then again if he changes it people will not be happy either, me i will wait and see (same as i am with war of the worlds) and just watch it when it comes out.
|
|
|
|
|
28-06-2005, 15:33
|
#47
|
|
Trusted User
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Merseyside
Posts: 1,338
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
I wish Jack Black had introduced the trailer and said "This is the greatest and best film in the world ever....Tribute!"
Peter Jackson has got some giant gorilla sized feet to fill and that trailer just made want to go back and watch the original again.
|
|
|
|
|
28-06-2005, 16:25
|
#48
|
|
I MUST HEAR FIREWORKS
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Bristol, in Bristol. Not Avon.
Posts: 8,933
Thanks: 52
Thanked 36 Times in 18 Posts
|
Seeing as the CG is clearly unfinished, I thought they would have hid the ropey monsters a bit more - which would also have built up anticipation to the final reveal in the film.
|
|
|
|
|
28-06-2005, 17:07
|
#49
|
|
Trusted User
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: merseyside
Posts: 3,971
Thanks: 5
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
just seen the clip now for the first time on channel 4 and never mind the size of kong peter jackson must have lost about 6 stone.not to sure about the dinosaur but apart from that it looked ok to me 
Last edited by S1LVERBACK; 28-06-2005 at 17:07.
|
|
|
|
|
28-06-2005, 17:16
|
#50
|
|
Alias
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 9,012
Thanks: 1
Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by S1LVERBACK
just seen the clip now for the first time on channel 4 and never mind the size of kong peter jackson must have lost about 6 stone.not to sure about the dinosaur but apart from that it looked ok to me |
Me too ! what kind of diet is the man on, he looked completely different to the last time he was at the Oscars. I almost didn't recognise him.
|
|
|
|
|
28-06-2005, 17:18
|
#51
|
|
Banned
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Wales
Posts: 2,048
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
I believe Jackson had his stomach stapled and he also had eye surgery, most horrifyingly while awake.
|
|
|
|
|
28-06-2005, 17:24
|
#52
|
|
Trusted User
Join Date: May 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 3,268
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Hope that doesn't break any copyright stuff. It's just the best example of Kong's size.
He's always been smaller than most people imagine. It's a misconception that he's Godzilla sized. Though I think they made him bigger in the 70s version.
(And what's with Peter Jackson? I thought making LOTR would have made him frail and thin and ill, yet he remained chubby and glowing throughout... why has King Kong done that to him? I guess he could have chosen to diet himself.)
Last edited by SqueakyG; 28-06-2005 at 17:26.
|
|
|
|
|
28-06-2005, 17:31
|
#53
|
|
Trusted User
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: East Tilbury, Thurrock
Posts: 1,138
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
|
Film looks good...is peter jackson got some serious disease..seriously the man looks bad
|
|
|
|
|
28-06-2005, 17:34
|
#54
|
|
Passed away :(
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 18,791
Thanks: 1
Thanked 3 Times in 2 Posts
|
It's pretty obvious that the computer effects haven't been finalised yet.
|
|
|
|
|
28-06-2005, 18:15
|
#55
|
|
Dead
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: In Hell
Posts: 10,543
Thanks: 38
Thanked 53 Times in 38 Posts
|
Awfull trailer which made me cringe at how bad it looks. I am dreading this film now as I thought it would at least look fun, it just looks pants. Bad casting, bad film to remake.
Really hope it turns out better than that trailer and the fact its a remake of a poor film doesnt help much, I would rather they remade the 70's version.
|
|
|
|
|
28-06-2005, 19:15
|
#56
|
|
Mind your head...
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: ... on that light fitting
Posts: 2,448
Thanks: 24
Thanked 23 Times in 11 Posts
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by RomerojpgX
... I would rather they remade the 70's version.
|
er... ok 
__________________
Don't say it didn't... it did!
|
|
|
|
|
28-06-2005, 20:04
|
#57
|
|
Trusted User
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 10,574
Thanks: 79
Thanked 85 Times in 58 Posts
|
I thought it looked excellent.
|
|
|
|
|
28-06-2005, 20:16
|
#58
|
|
XBL/PSN : SPOOKYVILLE
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: West Yorkshire
Posts: 15,962
Thanks: 0
Thanked 80 Times in 46 Posts
|
|
|
|
|
|
28-06-2005, 20:24
|
#59
|
|
Trusted User
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 8,100
Thanks: 123
Thanked 296 Times in 92 Posts
|
I was very shocked at what PJ looked like, i paused it and showed the missus she said .That was the guy who done LOTR before he got fat'  Bless her
It did look like he was from the 70's though and what was with the jumper.
 
Last edited by Herbal; 28-06-2005 at 20:39.
|
|
|
|
|
29-06-2005, 03:53
|
#60
|
|
Trusted User
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Liverpool
Posts: 1,582
Thanks: 7
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
 Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 01:08.
|
|
for the first point and 
for the second..
