We had this discussion at a dinner when we was talking about Charlie and the Chocolate factory and how it compared to Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory. The question of what makes a classic came up.
Is a classic film a film that stands the test of time? What about instant classics?
Is a classic film one that provokes a sense of nostalgia? Again, what about instant classics?
Is a classic film a film that cannot be made better? Does this mean that the label of "classic" is not permanent? Also, who's to say that it cannot be made better?
Is a classic film a film that broke new ground in that it was a style of film never done before? If so what about classics like "Goodfellas". This is not something that broke new ground.
What about the generation gap? The latest generation watch a remake of an old "classic" and prefer the later one. Does this mean that the old one no longer qualifies as a classic?
Also, what about international borders? "Reservoir Dogs" would be considered by some to be classic Tarrantino - but this was plagiarised from a Japanese film.
Interesting discussion. Kept us busy for two and a half hours. Anyone else have a view on this?