I posted in this thread because I saw some information that I thought might be of use to someone.
You've done nothing but try and cause trouble making various incorrect assertions that are not in any way intended to assist anyone looking for a supplier.
I posted in this thread because I saw some information that I thought might be of use to someone.
You've done nothing but try and cause trouble making various incorrect assertions that are not in any way intended to assist anyone looking for a supplier.
I asserted that this thread was in the bargain thread : correct.
I asserted that the original price was there : correct.
I asserted that I considered that the bargain thread was for new products : correct given that I agree that graded products can be considered such.
So I'm not sure who I'm misleading or causing trouble for?
Incidentally, a link cannot be posted but there IS a NEW one available for £799 currently on the bay. I hope that may help anyone who wanted one.
I asserted that this thread was in the bargain thread : correct.
Well, there is no evidence (as there is with any other thread I've ever seen moved) that this is the case.
Quote:
So I'm not sure who I'm misleading or causing trouble for?
Erroneously stating that only new items appear in the bargain forum. That is not the case.
Erroneously stating that Alan said what he did because it was not a brand new item. Also not the case as he has himself said.
Stating "I have no idea what your accusing Alan b of here" when I wasn't accusing him of anything. I just said that the thread title was misleading which it is. I've seen many threads have their titles changed when the headline price is no longer available.
Well, there but there is no evidence (as there is with any other thread I've ever seen moved) that this is the case.
Erroneously stating that only new items appear in the bargain forum. That is not the case.
Erroneously stating that Alan said what he did because it was not a brand new item. Also not the case as he has himself said.
Stating "I have no idea what your accusing Alan b of here" when I wasn't accusing him of anything. I just said that the thread title was misleading which it is. I've seen many threads have their titles changed when the headline price is no longer available.
Luv, it was in the bargain forum. Give it a rest eh?
As to your other points, whilst it appears that you also have nothing better to do, I stated my view of the relevance not Alan's. How could I state Alan's view?
Further I cannot do anything erroneous with the phrase "I have no idea what your accusing Alan b of here." Because I had no idea what you were. That you were not is irrelevant to the fact that I had no idea. That you were not does not make my statement erroneous.
In any event I've assisted with posting two "bargains" above. Shall we leave it there and find something better to do with our time?
I've seen many threads have their titles changed when the headline price is no longer available.
No on here you haven't as we never change threads titles just because the item isn't available anymore as there is no point in doing it, that is why this thread title hasn't been altered.
Luv, it was in the bargain forum. Give it a rest eh?
There is no marker in the bargain forum as is left behind when threads are moved.
Those markers are placed there by the software for the specific purpose of preventing arguments and confusion when a thread is moved.
If there's no marker you must be mistaken about it ever being there.
Just as you were mistaken about only new items appearing in the bargain forum.
Just as you were mistaken about the reason Alan posted what he did.
Quote:
In any event I've assisted with posting two "bargains" above.
You eventually posted two bargains after I pointed out that the only reason you'd posted in this thread before that was to make trouble.
It's people like you who make others feel it's just not worth while taking the trouble to post information for the benefit of forum members which is a pity.
There is no marker in the bargain forum as is left behind when threads are moved.
Those markers are placed there by the software for the specific purpose of preventing arguments and confusion when a thread is moved.
If there's no marker you must be mistaken about it ever being there.
Just as you were mistaken about only new items appearing in the bargain forum.
Just as you were mistaken about the reason Alan posted what he did.
You eventually posted two bargains after I pointed out that the only reason you'd posted in this thread before that was to make trouble.
It's people like you who make others feel it's just not worth while taking the trouble to post information for the benefit of forum members which is a pity.
It was in the bargain forum. It was moved.
Are you claiming Alan b is lying when he says it was? Or that he moved it?
He also missed bit where I said that we have the ability to leave the redirect in place for a certain length of time, in this case I left it there for a day so it will not be visible in the Bargain Forum now.
Are you claiming Alan b is lying when he says it was? Or that he moved it?
Quote:
Originally Posted by CLH
Do you see it? At all?
All of that is completely irrelevant anyway because your assertion that only new items appear in the bargain forum was wrong. So where it started out is neither here nor there.
No on here you haven't as we never change threads titles just because the item isn't available anymore as there is no point.
Would not the point be to save people from thinking there was a bargain available and wasting their time (and your server resources) looking at a thread only to find they had been mislead by the title?
It would seem a courtesy that some forum members think worthwhile as there is evidence of title changes in the index on several occasions.
Or are we just supposed to assume that anything that looks like a bargain in this forum is a defunct thread from elsewhere?
All of that is completely irrelevant anyway because your assertion that only new items appear in the bargain forum was wrong. So where it started out is neither here nor there.
So my incorrect belief negates the fact that you were wholly wrong that this had been moved?